Subsidiaries of China State Construction Engineering Corporation (CSCEC) Win Multiple Engineering Projects in China
2026-06-16 15:18
Favorite

en.Wedoany.com Reported - China Construction Eighth Engineering Division Corp., Ltd. won the general construction contract for the new site of Shenyang Hunnan District Central Hospital with a bid of RMB 611.9886 million. Located in Hunnan District, Shenyang, the project covers a total land area of 57,003.13 square meters and a total floor area of 116,261.94 square meters, including 72,583.64 square meters above ground and 43,678.30 square meters underground. The construction scope includes Building #1 (66,246.34 square meters above ground and 43,391.96 square meters underground), Building #2 (Fever Clinic, 3,715.29 square meters), and Building #3 (Supporting Facilities, 2,622.01 square meters above ground and 286.34 square meters underground), covering all disciplines such as architecture, structure, water supply and drainage, HVAC, electrical, fire protection, civil air defense, and park supporting facilities. The second-ranked bidder, China Railway First Group Co., Ltd., quoted RMB 606,066,808.98 (RMB 606.0668 million), the lowest among the three bidders; the third-ranked bidder, Minmetals 23rd Metallurgical Group Co., Ltd., quoted RMB 612,119,460.10. Leveraging its technical and credit advantages under the comprehensive scoring system, China Construction Eighth Engineering Division won the bid with a price approximately RMB 5.12 million higher than the second-ranked bidder. This phenomenon has also been observed in recent public construction projects in Beijing, Tangshan, and other cities.

China Construction Third Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd. won the general construction contract for Phase II of the open-pit mining project at Fuquan Xinghong Building Materials Sand and Gravel Yard with a bid of RMB 759 million. Located in Fuquan City, Qiannan Buyi and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Guizhou Province, the project adopts open-pit mining over an area of approximately 0.1315 square kilometers, aiming to enhance local building material supply capacity and improve comprehensive utilization of sand and gravel resources. The bids from the three candidates were highly concentrated: the second-ranked bidder, Shouxin Construction Co., Ltd., quoted RMB 759.865 million, and the third-ranked bidder, Zhicheng Jianke Design Co., Ltd., quoted RMB 759.889 million, with a difference of less than RMB 890,000 (approximately 0.12%) from the first-ranked bidder. This represents one of the most fiercely contested tenders in the mining sector recently.

China Construction Third Engineering Bureau also won the EPC general contract for Plot C of the P (2025) 229 Block Project in Wuhan East Lake High-Tech Development Zone with a bid of RMB 93.94204518 million. The project involves the construction of new residential buildings and supporting facilities, with a total floor area of approximately 105,389.76 square meters, including a gross floor area of approximately 76,999.76 square meters. The EPC scope covers preliminary design and budget preparation, construction drawing design, engineering construction, equipment procurement, and all work up to completion acceptance and overall handover. The EPC contract for Plot D of the same project was also awarded to China Construction Third Engineering Bureau at RMB 188.34847260 million, approximately twice the bid for Plot C. The consecutive wins of both Plots C and D in the same project demonstrate the company's sustained competitiveness in the residential EPC market in Wuhan's Optics Valley area.

China Construction First Group The Third Construction Co., Ltd. won the bid for the CY00-0215-0627 Block Project in the Land Primary Development Zone of Taiyanggong New District D, Chaoyang District, Beijing, with a bid of RMB 514,151,987.61 (RMB 514.1520 million). Located in Taiyanggong Township, Chaoyang District, the project has a total floor area of approximately 89,583.68 square meters (53,961.68 square meters above ground and 35,622.00 square meters underground), with an estimated contract value of RMB 527.7 million and a construction period of 761 calendar days. The construction scope covers all work including foundation and substructure, main structure, decoration, water supply and drainage, heating and ventilation, air conditioning, electrical, intelligent building, elevators, and outdoor engineering. The bid from China Construction First Group The Third Construction Co., Ltd. is approximately RMB 13.65 million lower than the estimated value, with a bid-to-estimate ratio of about 97.4%. The second-ranked bidder, Beijing Zhuzong Fourth Development and Construction Co., Ltd., quoted RMB 518,054,715.26, and the third-ranked bidder, China Railway Sixth Group Co., Ltd., quoted RMB 516,196,548.35.

The consortium formed by China Construction Second Engineering Bureau Co., Ltd. and Hebei Jichuan Engineering Technology Consulting Co., Ltd. won the EPC general contract for the Tangxian Kerui Digital New Energy 200MW/400MWh Independent Energy Storage Power Station Project with a bid of RMB 418,000,000.00 (RMB 418.00 million). Located in Baihe Town, Tang County, Baoding City, Hebei Province, the project is planned to cover 35 mu (approximately 2.33 hectares) with a total capacity of 200MW/400MWh, including 40 sub-units of 5MW/10.03MWh each (each sub-unit contains two 5.015MWh energy storage battery compartments and one 5MW energy storage step-up compartment). A new 220kV step-up substation is required, with a construction period of only 155 calendar days. The tender scope is a turnkey EPC contract covering all work including design, equipment procurement and transportation management, green compensation, construction, commissioning, quality supervision and acceptance, and grid connection procedures. The second-ranked bidder, the consortium of Hebei Qingneng Electric Power Co., Ltd. and Shunfeng Construction Co., Ltd., quoted RMB 420,090,000, and the third-ranked bidder, the consortium of Daxin Construction Co., Ltd. and Zhonglian Hechuang Design Co., Ltd., quoted RMB 412,984,337.13, the lowest among the three bidders, but failed to win due to the dominance of comprehensive scoring weights.

This article is compiled by Wedoany. All AI citations must indicate the source as "Wedoany". If there is any infringement or other issues, please notify us promptly, and we will modify or delete it accordingly. Email: news@wedoany.com