en.Wedoany.com Reported - The Mexican government has announced an investment of 140.9 billion Mexican pesos ($8.1 billion) by 2030 for the modernization, maintenance, and expansion of the country's natural gas pipeline network, a scale unprecedented in Mexico's natural gas industry. Emilia Calleja, General Manager of the Federal Electricity Commission (CFE), confirmed that nine new CFE pipelines will concentrate 38% of the total investment, specifically supplying 13 new combined-cycle power plants. These plants will add nearly 8,000 megawatts (MW) of capacity between 2026 and 2027, with seven of them scheduled to begin operations this year.
One of the most strategically significant projects is the Libramiento Reynosa pipeline, which is 99.21% complete and scheduled to begin operations in June 2026. It will connect SISTRANGAS (the Mexican Natural Gas Transportation System) with the Texas Eastern Transmission Pipeline Company and the Tennessee Gas Pipeline, thereby increasing natural gas supply to northern Mexico. This progress is notable for the energy sector, which has witnessed unfulfilled promises regarding storage and pipeline commitments over the past decade.
However, in 2025, Mexico imported 6.63 billion cubic feet per day (Bcf/d) of natural gas via pipeline from the United States. Dry gas imports have been steadily increasing over the past few decades, while domestic dry gas production has generally declined. Between 2020 and 2024, Mexico relied on imports for 69% to 75% of its dry gas consumption.
Juan Paulo Cervantes, Commercial Director of Solensa, stated that Mexico depends on imports for most of its natural gas consumption and that it will remain a highly competitive commodity for the next 15 years. However, pipelines alone are insufficient; it is necessary to ensure gas availability when needed. He noted that Europe and the United States have over 100 gigawatts (GW) of storage capacity, while Mexico has only 2.8 GW, a gap that must be closed. He emphasized that infrastructure connectivity is not the same as storage, and confusing the two exposes the system to risk. Resilience requires alternatives, not just pipelines, but also the ability to absorb shocks during supply chain disruptions.
Cuitláhuac García, General Manager of the Mexican Natural Gas Pipeline System Operator (CENAGAS), pointed out that 70% of Mexico's electricity comes from natural gas, making pipeline reliability a primary issue for grid security, not merely a fuel supply concern. When the National Energy Control Center (CENACE) issued an operational alert in early May due to demand exceeding 48,000 MW amid high temperatures, the adequacy of the pipeline network supplying Mexico's combined-cycle units shifted from a medium-term planning issue to an urgent operational priority.
The $8.1 billion investment plan targets the transmission and distribution segments and does not address the issue of gas supply sources. Wood Mackenzie forecasts that Mexico's dry gas production will slightly decline from 2.302 Bcf/d in 2025 to 2.299 Bcf/d in 2026. In other words, domestic production is not growing, and the new pipelines will transport more imported U.S. natural gas.
Jorge Sandoval, General Manager of the Mexican Natural Gas Association (AMGN), stated that beyond the immediate challenges of supply and storage, the core task is to build a truly comprehensive, resilient energy system with a long-term vision. The current level of national demand makes this urgency undeniable. He noted that the path forward rests on three pillars: expanding and strengthening storage capacity, reinforcing the distribution and infrastructure network, and developing domestic production. These are not independent priorities; they must be pursued synergistically if Mexico is to have a natural gas industry capable of supporting its promised industrial growth.
In March 2018, Mexico's Ministry of Energy issued a natural gas storage policy requiring a strategic inventory of 45 billion cubic feet by 2026, but no substantial progress has been made. David Madero, former head of CENAGAS, emphasized that strategic storage plans have existed for years but have not advanced.
The gap between infrastructure ambitions and operational realities is forcing Mexico's industrial sector to improvise. For companies that cannot wait for pipeline connections or storage facilities, the near-term solution is small-scale liquefied natural gas (LNG): transporting LNG by truck to industrial sites not connected to the pipeline network or where the pipeline system cannot guarantee supply security.
Diego Pecoraro, Director of Infrastructure and Capital Projects at Alvarez & Marsal, stated that the question companies are not asking loudly is what happens when operations are interrupted. He noted that disruptions now last for days, sometimes up to two weeks, with significant cost impacts. Energy has become a strategic asset, not a utility. Industrial parks are already promoting reliable energy supply as a differentiating competitive advantage. Locating a facility without secure energy not only incurs operational risk but also locks in capital without the ability to generate returns.
CENAGAS plans to hire small-scale LNG companies to manage peak shaving and provide a supply buffer, a pragmatic acknowledgment of the mismatch between formal infrastructure timelines and industrial demand schedules. Companies like Solensa (which built Mexico's first LNG liquefaction facility) represent a commercially driven response to the structural gap that government investment plans have yet to fill.
Guadalupe Paredes, CEO of Luxem Energía, stated that 60% of Mexico's natural gas consumption is directly used for power generation, meaning that improving the sector's competitiveness affects not just one link in the chain but everything. In terms of infrastructure, investment willingness is indeed weak because the cost of last-mile distribution can be prohibitively high. Demand exists, and many industrial users want to use pipeline gas but cannot connect. Therefore, in the absence of better options, some companies invest in building their own last-mile infrastructure to secure supply. This should not have been necessary; it indicates a structural gap that the market cannot solve alone.
Mexico's dependence on U.S. natural gas has always been a commercial issue but is evolving into a geopolitical one. The renegotiation of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) has explicitly placed energy on the trade agenda, and U.S. negotiators are well aware that Mexico's power grid relies on U.S. natural gas. Any disruption, politicization, or tariff on cross-border natural gas flows would have a direct impact on power generation, industrial production, and the nearshoring investment logic central to Mexico's economic strategy. In this context, the concepts of energy sovereignty and energy self-sufficiency lack a solid foundation.
The "2026-2030 Development and Welfare Infrastructure Investment Plan" lists energy as one of eight strategic areas for public and mixed investment projects, with a total project value of 5.6 trillion Mexican pesos. Within this plan, natural gas transportation and related infrastructure are considered priority components supporting industrial growth, power generation, and supply security. Underground storage, distributed LNG networks, and biomethane infrastructure all require private participation, a long-term regulatory framework, and viable returns amid price uncertainty and evolving energy laws. The March 2025 reform of the Electricity Industry Law (LESE) adjusted rules for private energy investment but has not yet provided the regulatory clarity needed for infrastructure financiers to commit to assets with return periods of 20 to 30 years.
This article is compiled by Wedoany. All AI citations must indicate the source as "Wedoany". If there is any infringement or other issues, please notify us promptly, and we will modify or delete it accordingly. Email: news@wedoany.com
